A500.6.3.RB – Qualitative Research

-
Saldana, J., Leavy, P. and Beretvas N. (2011) defined qualitative research as: 
An umbrella term for a wide variety of approaches to and methods for the study of natural social life.  The information or data collected and analyzed is primarily (but not exclusively) nonquantitative in character, consisting of textual materials such as interview transcripts, fieldnotes, and documents, and/or visual materials such as artifacts, photographs, video recordings, and Internet sites, that document human experiences about others and/or one’s self in social action and reflexive states.
According to Hoepfl, M. (1997), researchers have been for quite sometime debating the comparable value of qualitative and quantitative research.  Qualitative researchers quest for understanding, illumination and extrapolation to same situations while quantitative researchers quest for prediction, causal determination, and generalization of findings. 
Hoepfl, M. (1997), claimed that there were various situations to be taken into account when making decisions in adopting the methodology of qualitative research such as situations wherein a researcher needed to identify first and foremost the variables that might be tested quantitatively in the future, or where a researcher has fully determined that quantitative measures cannot gratifyingly illuminate or describe a situation.  According to Hoepfl, M. (1997), Strauss and Corbin (1990) claimed that qualitative methods can be used to better understand any phenomenon about which little was yet known.  Qualitative methods can also be utilized in order to stimulate a new interpretation on things, about which was already known, or to enhanced in-depth information that may be intricate in communicating quantitatively.
In the article, New Insights into Ethical Leadership: A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Executive Ethical Leaders, Firsch and Huppenbauer (2013), qualitative content analysis was utilized by Firsch and Huppenbauer (2013) as a method for analyzing the interview transcripts because it offers a systematic, rule-guided approach that is intersubjectively comprehensible.  The qualitative approach not only enabled Firsch and Huppenbauer to validate what they had suspected before the study but also, made them aware of new multiple facets of ethical leadership.  Although the qualitative research on the experiences of executive ethical leaders conducted by Firsch and Huppenbauer has its own weaknesses, I can say that the study has opened avenues for future research and can be utilized as a source of hypothesis for a quantitative research on ethical leadership.  The study made me contemplate the necessity of every organization to develop recruitment and assessment tools and training programs for ethical leadership.  Ethical behavior of an organization’s workforce and stakeholders is very dependent on its leaderships’ ethical behavior.
Therefore, I can conclude that a qualitative research generally has the following features: a) it utilizes elemental climate as the excerpt of data; b) the qualitative researcher acts as the data collection’s human determinant; c) qualitative research has an interpretive nature and is intent on discovering the meaningful events of individuals who experienced them; and d) qualitative researchers pay attention to the eccentricities of every study pursuing to find the uniqueness of every study or research.  The specific design of qualitative research leans on the goal of the exploration i.e. credible and meaningful information.  Determination of the relevance and applicability of the information are charged to the qualitative researcher and the reader.

References:
Firsch, Colina and Huppenbauer, Markus (2013). New Insights into Ethical Leadership: A
Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Executive Ethical Leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 123.1: 23-43.  Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/docview/1552334786?pq-origsite=summon
Hoepfl, Marie C. (1997). Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education
Researchers. Journal of Technology Education, Volume 9, Number 1. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v9n1/hoepfl.html#strauss
Saldana, Johnny, Leavy, Patricia, and Beretvas, Natasha (2011). Fundamentals of Qualitative
Research. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/our-  mission/405
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and

techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A634.9.4.RB – A Reflection of our Learning

-
A Reflection of our Learning Ethics and Corporate Responsibility has been for some reason that I cannot explain has been very challenging to me in comparison with the other ten courses that I have completed so far.  At first, my first impression of the course was that how complicated can the course be.  I have lived my life and placed myself on high moral and ethical standards based on my mother’s influence, my teachers, instructors, mentors, etc.  But I was wrong.  I found myself digging very hard, reading the instructions and still found myself sometimes confused as to how to phrase my thoughts and put them into words. This course had made me look deeper into who I am and the ethical and moral standards that I uphold.  I have always believed that e thics is that of our moral beliefs that conform to the way we live and the way we create our world through the choices we make every day.  We are the best of who we are when we ethically live our lives in excellence, compassion, acco
Read more

A634.3.4.RB – The Harder They Fall

-
According to Yukl, (2012), Leadership is the process of influencing others to understand and agree on the ways to accomplish objectives and the process of facilitating individual and collective efforts to achieve shared goals (p. 7).  To be able to analyze and assess the effectiveness of and different approaches to leadership, it is of the utmost importance to discuss various ways of how leadership is defined.  Yukl (2012) indicated that leadership has many modes of denotation for different individuals. Therefore behavioral scientists and practitioners believe that leadership is a vital phenomenon that can be defined in various ways.  Many organizations, may it be a not-for-profit, private businesses or governmental, benefit greatly when their workforce can collaborate to achieve organizational goals and have the capacity to get to know each other and understand how to work cohesively.  Different studies conducted by psychologists indicated that an individual’s ethical behavior is
Read more

A634.7.4.RB – Ethics and Behaviors

-
Ethics and Behaviors According to LaFollette (2007), a psychological egoist claims to define the reason why we behave the way we do and points out that we act congruence to our self-interest yet cannot clearly explain the rationale behind our interests.  Ethical egoist, on the other hand, claims that there is only one moral standard that is to say that we should act and behave in manners that maximize our self-interest (LaFollette, 2007).  LaFollette (2007) further stated that although morality does not dictate that we have to sacrifice our self-interest for others and visa vi, that does not mean that we have to take advantage of other’s vulnerability nor mistreat and abuse others. All management team, as well as the members of the workforce of every organization, must have a formalized code to live by for a successful organization to operate ethically and morally.  It is of utmost importance that all members of the workforce from the CEO and members of the executive team to the
Read more